If you want to see a real life example of a “superior” liberal, look no future than this condescending and unthinking statement from useful idiot’s blog:
Liberals are fundamentally better people than conservatives.
I think anyone who’s argued with a liberal has had the unpleasant experience of being treated like you’re morally deficient if not outright dishonest and stupid.
It turns out there’s a reason for this: if feels good to be a liberal:
In healthy people, the more you activate a portion of your frontal lobes, the more accurate your view of yourself is,” says Jennifer Beer, an assistant professor of psychology, who conducted the research with graduate student Brent L. Hughes. “And the more you view yourself as desirable or better than your peers, the less you use those lobes.”
The natural human tendency to see oneself in a positive light can be helpful and motivating in some situations but detrimental in others, Beer says.
“Subjects made unrealistically positive judgments about themselves more quickly, suggesting these judgments require fewer mental resources,” Beer says. “Perhaps, like the visual system, the social judgment system is designed to give us a quick ‘good enough’ perception for the sake of efficiency.” (Source: Brain Activity Levels Affect Self-Perception: ‘Rose-Colored Glasses’ Correlate With Less Frontal Lobe Use).
The “cognitive efficiency” argument is interesting. Jonathan Haidt has found that traditional conservative moral judgment takes into account more information and factors than liberal moral judgment. Liberals are clearly more computationally simple when arriving at moral judgments, right or wrong. There may be social advantages to this, but one disadvantage “may be” holding a simplified moral view of oneself. Is decreased frontal lobe activity correlated with bases towards simpler moral computation? Only further research could answer that.
You can catch of video Dr. Haidt talking about his fascinating work below:
P.S. Note that there is also a relationship between frontal lobe activity and getting a grip on reality. Liberal and left-wing hero Howard Zinn wrote extensively about the Rosenbergs who he defended as innocent of the charges of treason against them. To err is human — apparently, however, to not care if you’re right or wrong, to turn off your frontal lobe, is liberal and left-wing:
When Sobel Rosenberg confessed his espionage to the The New York Times earlier this year, Zinn told a reporter, “To me it didn’t matter whether they were guilty or not.” (Source: The People’s Historian? Howard Zinn was a master of agitprop, not history).
Like this Post? EMAIL IT TO YOUR FRIENDS!!













{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 0 comments… add one now }